Login with your Social Account

Mars Image

The secret story of Mars

Mars, the fourth planet in our solar system, has been a source of intrigue for quite a while now. There have been several theories on what its constituents are, and several more on how it could be potentially habitable. Can humans live on Mars? Can Mars support civilization? Is there life form already existing there? Contained within the mysteries of the red planet are the answers to these questions. However, a fair attempt at answering these questions can certainly be made. Read on if you wish to know more about the Red Planet and its mysteries.

Why is Mars being considered?

Mars is the next best candidate in our solar system for supporting life. It exists at a distance that is neither too far nor too near to the Sun which is technically called the Goldilocks zone. The surface properties, as examined by scientists, also seem to suggest a possibility for the existence of life on the planet. Mars is perhaps the only planet in the solar system that could provide crucial answers about life forms. Understanding the structure and physical properties of Mars is therefore essential. Mars could provide us with the answer to whether life is prevalent in the universe or is exclusive to the Earth.

The proximity and several similarities to Earth make Mars a prime candidate. Most investigations of Mars have been carried out through telescopic observations and probes. Scientists have recognized certain habitability factors whose values could provide us with valuable information to determine whether life can be supported on Mars or not. These habitability factors are water, chemical environment, energy for metabolism and conducive physical conditions. The right combinations of the values for these habitability factors would mean that life can exist on Mars.

If the evidence for the claim that Mars can support life is conclusive enough, it would be groundbreaking. It would allow humanity to expand beyond the constraints imposed by the properties and nature of the Earth.

Similarities to Earth


Earth and Mars. Image Source: NASA

The similarities that Mars shares with Earth have been a major reason for all the speculation around its potential to support life. Conditions such as sunlight and temperature are very similar to that of the Earth’s and no other planet or moon in the solar system has a similarity greater than that of Mars with the Earth.

The Martian day, referred to as a sol, is very similar in duration to that of the Earth’s. A Martian day, or, sol, is 24 hours, 39 minutes and 35 seconds long. The similar duration of the day would enable easier conformity to Mars’s days if humans were to colonize it.

The axial tilt of Mars is also extremely similar to that of the Earth’s. Mars has an axial tilt of 25.19° as opposed to Earth’s axial tilt of 23.44°. This means that seasons on Mars are quite similar to that of seasons on Earth.

Mars also has a large enough surface area to support human colonies. The amount of dry land on Mars is only slightly lesser than the amount of dry land on Earth.

Perhaps, the most significant similarity is the presence of water. Water is where life forms originated from. Water is necessary to sustain life and life would cease to exist if water is absent.

Water on Mars

Perhaps, the most promising sign of the possibility of life on Mars is the existence of water on the planet. There has been conclusive evidence to suggest that water exists on Mars. Presence of water is necessary, but, not a sufficient condition to sustain life. The fact that water exists on Mars is extremely promising and exciting. Most of the water on Mars exists in the form of ice. Some water also exists in the form of vapor in the atmosphere and an even smaller amount exists in the form of liquid.

The polar ice caps on Mars contain the most amount of water. The northern ice cap of Mars is called PlanumBoreum while its southern counterpart is called PlanumAustrale. It is calculated that if all the ice on the southern polar cap melted, it would be sufficient to cover the entire planetary surface of Mars to a depth of 36ft.

The Phoenix lander launched by NASA confirmed the presence of water at the place where it landed in the northern polar ice cap. Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter took measurements of the ice present in the northern polar cap and estimated that the ice present in the northern ice cap is sufficient to cover the surface of Mars to a depth of 18ft. Several orbiters have also confirmed the presence of water in the form of ice in several craters on the surface of Mars.

Phoenix Lander small

Artist’s concept of the Phoenix Mars Lander. (Source: NASA/JPL/Corby Waste)

This shows that water is available in abundance on Mars and could help sustain life on the planet. These discoveries are nothing short of radical and could go a long way in helping humanity understand Mars, which, would enable easier colonization.

Problems that prevent colonization

Mars is several times colder than the Earth. Temperatures could reach drastically low values on Mars which could prove to be detrimental to human life.  The surface temperatures on Mars lies in the range -87°C to -5°C and this certainly would pose a problem to human habitation.

Despite findings of water on Mars, the quantity of water is a source of concern. In order to satiate the needs of the current population on Earth, Mars would need several times the amount of water that it is estimated to have.

Another cause for concern is the toxicity of the Martian atmosphere. Martian atmosphere contains 95% carbon dioxide, 3% nitrogen and 1.6% argon. The amount of oxygen in the atmosphere is a meager 0.4% according to estimations. This poses an extremely severe problem.

Mars also has a thin atmosphere that does not block out Ultraviolet radiation coming from the Sun. These radiations are extremely harmful and could cause several deformities in human beings.

The surface gravity of Mars is only 38% of that of the Earth. Lower surface gravity could cause a lot of harm. Problems such as space motion sickness, cardiovascular problems, muscle loss, and bone demineralization could occur in such conditions.

Global dust storms are common throughout the year, on Mars. Surviving these dust storms and their effects on the planet would be an exacting task. These storms could leave the planet covered with dust and prevent sunlight from reaching the surface.

Random Quiz

The following planet(s) has(have) ring around it(them):

Correct! Wrong!

All of the giant planets in our solar system have rings: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Jupiter's ring is thin and dark, and cannot be seen from Earth. Saturn's rings are the most magnificent; they are bright, wide, and colorful.

Seasons and days on Mars

A Martian year roughly equals 686.86 Earth days. The Darian calendar was proposed by Thomas Gangale to aid future human settlers on Mars. Each day is measured in sols. The sol is longer than a day on Earth by 39 minutes and 35 seconds. Each year is 668.59 sols (686.86 days on Earth).

The Darian calendar consists of 24 months. The last month in the calendar is 27 sols generally. If the year is a leap year, then, the last month would have an additional sol and consist of 28 sols. Only three other months have 27 sols, all other months have 28 sols. 

Why has there not been a mission to Mars?

There have been several impeding factors that have prevented missions that aim at the full exploration of Mars. These space programs intended on discovering truths about life and space require extremely large amounts of money.

The notion is that it is moronic to be spending such exorbitant amounts of money and resources on something that could prove to be futile. There is no guaranteeing that the results from these explorations will prove to be positive. Therefore, there is a considerable amount of risk involved with these programs. There are already enough problems on Earth that need addressing and need sorting out. The search for planets that would enable humans to be spacefaring species would prove to be a self-inflicted problem. A problem that is brought upon us during times when there exist other problems that need addressing.

There is no denying that the findings on Mars could be radical and change the course of human history entirely. But, the impeding factors would probably prove to be too powerful to allow for ventures of such proportion to take place.

Mark Zuckerberg, who is the founder of Facebook and the individual who is widely regarded to have revolutionized social media, once said, “The biggest risk is not taking any risk. In a world that is changing really quickly, the only strategy that is guaranteed to fail is not taking risks”. He certainly makes a point and maybe, exploration of Mars is a risk that is worth taking. It is certainly a high risk-high reward scenario, but, when the reward is as lucrative as it is in the case of Mars exploration, then, it would almost seem too ridiculous to not take the risk.

Perhaps, it is not worth the effort or the expense to venture onto Mars. The prospect of understanding the universe, on the other hand, makes it worth the risk. The only question that lingers is: Is humanity willing to take a punt and explore Mars, or, is humanity going to be perpetually confined to the curtailments of the Earth?

Read More:

  1. The first evidence of planet-wide groundwater system on Mars
  2. SpaceX Has a Bold Timeline for Getting to Mars and Starting a Colony
How Did Life Start on Earth

How Did Life Start on Earth?

The secret of how life on Earth began

How did life begin? There will hardly be a much bigger question. For the abundance of human history, nearly everybody believed some version of “the gods did it”. The other rationalization was out of the question.

Is the existence of life on Earth a lucky fluke or associate inevitable consequence of the laws of nature? Is it easy forever to emerge on a fresh fashioned planet, or is it the nearly not possible product of an extended series of unlikely events? Advances in fields as disparate as uranology, planetary science and chemistry currently hold promise that answers to such profound queries could also be around the corner. If life seems to possess emerged multiple times in our galaxy, as scientists hope to find, the trail thereto can’t be thus exhausting. Moreover, if the route from chemistry to biology proves easy to traverse, the universe might be abundant with life.

During a beautiful surprise, most the fresh discovered star systems look terribly totally different from our own. Will that mean one thing regarding our own, very odd, system favors the emergence of life? sleuthing signs of life on a planet orbiting a foreign star isn’t getting to be simple, however, the technology for teasing out delicate “biosignatures” is developing thus chop-chop that with luck we tend to may even see distant life at intervals one or 20 years.

Experiments to figure out origins

  1. Miller-Urey experiment

In 1952, Stanley Miller was operating with Harold C. Harold Urey designed associate experiment to visualize however advanced organic molecules might need to be fashioned underneath the conditions of early Earth. They believed the first Earth atmosphere would are composed of an alkane series, ammonia, chemical element, and vapor. They sealed these gases in associate airtight instrumentality, and then exposed the gases to sparks of electricity to simulate lightning. They continued the lightning for per week, and by the top, an achromatic substance had coated the walls of the instrumentality. This substance contained eleven of the twenty amino acids employed by life on earth. Since Miller and Harold Urey performed this experiment, its results are confirmed over and over by different scientists. Several scientists currently believe that the first Earth’s atmosphere was composed of carbonic acid gas, nitrogen, and vapor.

miller urey experiment

Image Source: Wikipedia

Modern experiments with this mixture of gases manufacture similar results suggesting that early conditions on Earth made advanced organic molecules that in all probability became the premise for the event of additionally advanced organisms. However, scientists haven’t been able to replicate the formation of even easy organisms or something which will very replicate itself. There square measure many theories on however the amino acids might need to be created the leap into the advanced, self-replicating life we tend to see nowadays.

  1. Vitalism

Before the 1800s, the general public believed in “vitalism”. This is often the intuitive concept that living things were blessed with a special, charming property that created them totally different from inanimate objects.

The chemicals of life will all be made up of easier chemicals that don’t have anything to try and do with life

Vitalism was typically certain up with cherished spiritual beliefs. The Bible says that God used “the breath of life” to animate the primary humans, associated an immortal soul may be a type of philosophical theory.

There is only 1 drawback. A philosophical theory is obviously wrong.

By the first 1800s, scientists had discovered many substances that appeared to be distinctive to life. One such chemical was an organic compound that is found in excretion and was isolated in 1799.

This was still, just, compatible with philosophical theory. Solely living things appeared to be ready to create these chemicals; therefore maybe they were infused with life energy which was what created them special.

But in 1828, the German chemist Friedrich Wöhler found some way to form organic compound from a typical chemical known as ammonia cyanate that had no obvious reference to living things. Others followed in his footsteps, and it had been presently clear that the chemicals of life will all be made up of easier chemicals that don’t have anything to try and do with life.

This was the top of philosophical theory as a scientific construct. However, individuals found it deeply arduous to giving up of the thought. For many, the expression that there’s nothing “special” regarding the chemicals of life appeared to rob a lifetime of its magic, to cut back the United States to mere machines. It also, of course, contradicted the Bible.

The mystery of life’s origin was unheeded for many years

Even scientists have struggled to shed philosophical theory. As late as 1913, English chemist Benjamin Moore was fervidly pushing a theory of “biotic energy”, that was basically philosophical theory below a special name. The thought had a robust emotional hold.

Today the thought clings on in sudden places. As an example, there are lots of science-fiction stories during which an individual’s “life energy” is boosted or drained away. Consider the “regeneration energy” employed by the Time Lords in Doctor United Nations agency, which might even be lidded up if it runs low. This feels futurist, however, it’s a deeply old school plan.

Still, when 1828 scientists had legitimate reasons to seem for a deity-free rationalization for the way the primary life shaped. However, they didn’t. It feels like a plain subject to explore, however in reality, the mystery of life’s origin was unheeded for many years. Maybe everybody was still too showing emotion connected to philosophical theory to require consecutive step.

  1. Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

Darwin’s theory, come into being in On the Origin of Species in 1859, explained however the immense diversity of life may all have arisen from one common relative. Rather than every one of the various species being created separately by God, they were all descended from a primeval organism that lived uncountable years past the last universal common relative.

This idea established vastly controversial, once more as a result of it contradicted the Bible. Darwin and his ideas came underneath furious attacks, significantly from angry Christians.

darwin evolution theory

Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Illustration. Image Source: ConexaoCabeca (Pixabay)

Darwin knew that it absolutely was a profound question, however – maybe cautious of beginning one more fight with the Church – he solely appears to possess mentioned the difficulty in an exceeding letter written in 1871.

The first hypothesis for the origin of life was unreal in an exceedingly brutally totalitarian country

“But if (what a giant if) we tend to may conceive in some heat very little pool with all kinds of ammonia salts,—light, heat, electricity &c gift, that a macromolecule compound was with chemicals fashioned, able to endure still additional complicated changes…”

In alternative words, what if there was once a tiny low body of water crammed with easy organic compounds and bathed in daylight. a number of those compounds would possibly mix to create a life-like substance like a macromolecule, that may then begin evolving and changing into additional complicated.

What came first?

  1. Metabolism

Some scientists believe that metabolism, in different words – the power to interrupt down greenhouse gas within the presence of a catalyst into tiny organic molecules – was, however, the primary life developed. These reactions may need to be evolved to become additionally complicated, and then genetic molecules somehow shaped and joined in later. There are many alternative theories on specifically what sorts of molecules and catalysts would are concerned.

  1. Genes

Other scientists believe that the primary living organisms were genes. These genes were single molecules that had developed in such some way on be ready to catalyze their own replication. This theory looks additional possible since even easy systems like crystals are incontestible to evolve with modifications that breed true. Some scientists have urged that bound compositions of clay produce the correct surroundings for these reactions to propagate.

  1. RNA

RNA could be a complicated molecule found altogether living things that appear to be ready to catalyze its own copy. Several scientists believe that straightforward ribonucleic acid molecules developed and eventually became a lot of complicated and developed into the organisms we have a tendency to see these days.

  1. LUCA

Astrobiologists and biochemists wish to grasp one thing they decision LUCA (the Last Universal Common Ancestor). The thought is that every one life on Earth encompasses a common ascendant, reasonably sort of a great-great-great-….-great grandparent. They rummage around for traits that are common across all life forms and assume that any traits that are common to any or all life forms nowadays should are familial from LUCA, WHO had all furthermore.

Last Universal Common Ancestor by Wikipedia

Last Universal Common Ancestor. Image Source: Wikipedia

Biochemists recognize quite a bit concerning LUCA and her organic chemistry. She keeps her genetic info in DNA, she had many hundred proteins performing arts a range of functions, and she or he used a similar twenty amino acids we tend to use in our proteins. She used polymer and had some reasonably double-layer macromolecule membrane. She was in all probability the ascendant of the 3 kingdoms of life: Archaea, Eukaryotes, and bacterium.

LUCA lived a minimum of a pair of billion years past before there was a lot of atomic number 8 within the atmosphere. She used enzymes containing iron in her metabolic pathways the approach a lot of life on early Earth did. Learning however life arose on Earth is helpful to astrobiologists, however, they confine mind that the approaching life shaped on Earth isn’t the sole approach life may have shaped. It’s merely a method that it did.

Modern Researches

What next? Chemists are already asking whether or not our quiet life are often generated solely through one plausible pathway or whether or not multiple routes would possibly lead from easy chemistry to RNA-based life and on to trendy biology. Others are exploring variations on the chemistry of life, seeking clues on the attainable diversity of life “out there” within the universe. If all goes well, we are going to eventually learn the way strong the transition from chemistry to biology is and so whether or not the universe is packed with life-forms or—but for us—sterile.

Every single one that died before Darwin revealed the Origin of Species in 1859 was blind to humanity’s origins, as a result of they knew nothing of evolution. However everybody alive currently, riddance isolated teams, will recognize the reality regarding our kinship with alternative animals.

Similarly, everybody born when spaceman orbited the world in 1961 has lived in a very society that may jaunt alternative worlds. Notwithstanding we tend to ne’er go ourselves, voyage may be a reality.

Our world views these modifications in delicate ways. Arguably, they create the North American nation wiser. Evolution teaches the North American nation to treasure each alternative animate thing, for they’re our cousins. The voyage permits the North American nation to visualize our world from a distance, revealing however distinctive and fragile it’s.l honestly say they recognize wherever they came from. They’ll recognize what their final antecedent was like and wherever it lived.

This knowledge cans modification of the North American nation. On a strictly scientific level, it’ll tell the North American nation regarding however probably life is to create within the Universe, and wherever to seem for it. And it’ll tell the North American nation one thing regarding life’s essential nature. However on the far side that, we tend to cannot nevertheless recognize the knowledge the origin of life can reveal.

Dark Energy

Dark Energy and the Fate of the Universe

Dark Matter & the Ultimate Fate of the Universe

So what is dark energy?

Well, the easy answer is that we do not recognize.

It looks to contradict several of our understandings regarding the manner the universe works. We all recognize that light-weight waves, conjointly known as radiation, carry energy. You feel that energy the instant you step outside on a hot summer day.

More is unknown than is thought. we all know what quantity dark energy there’s as a result of we all know however it affects the universe’s enlargement. apart from that, it’s an entire mystery. however, it’s a very important mystery. It seems that roughly sixty-eight of the universe is dark energy. matter makes up concerning twenty-seventh. the remainder – everything on Earth, everything ever determined with all of our instruments, all traditional matter – adds up to but five-hitter of the universe. come back to think about it, perhaps it should not be referred to as “normal” matter the least bit since it’s such a tiny low fraction of the universe.

One clarification for dark energy is that it’s a property of area. the physicist was the primary person to understand that a vacant area isn’t anything. the area has superb properties, several of that are simply starting to be understood. the primary property that Einstein discovered is that it’s potential for extra space to come back into existence.

Then one version of Einstein’s gravity theory, the version that contains a constant, makes a second prediction: “empty space” will possess its own energy. as a result of this energy may be a property of the area itself, it’d not be diluted as area expands. As extra space comes into existence, a lot of this energy-of-space would seem. As a result, this way of energy would cause the universe to expand quicker and quicker. sadly, nobody understands why the constant ought to even be there, abundant less why it’d have precisely the right worth to cause the discovered acceleration of the universe.

Another rationalization for the way house acquires energy comes from the scientific theory of matter. during this theory, “empty space” is really choked with temporary (“virtual”) particles that regularly type and so disappear. however once physicists tried to calculate what quantity energy this is able to offer empty house, the solution came out wrong – wrong by a great deal. the amount came out 10120 times too massive. that is a one with a hundred and twenty zeros once it. It’s laborious to urge a solution that unhealthy. that the mystery continues.

Another rationalization for dark energy is that it’s a brand new quite high-octane energy fluid or field, one thing that fills all of the areas however one thing whose result on the enlargement of the universe is that the opposite of that of matter and traditional energy. Some theorists have named this “quintessence,” when the fifth part of the Greek philosophers. But, if quintessence is that the answer, we have a tendency to still do not know what it’s like, what it interacts with, or why it exists. that the mystery continues.

The last chance is that Einstein’s theory of gravity isn’t correct. that will not solely have an effect on the enlargement of the universe, however, it might additionally have an effect on the method that ordinary matter in galaxies and clusters of galaxies behaved. This truth would supply the way to make your mind up if the answer to the dark energy downside may be a new gravity theory or not: we have a tendency to might observe however galaxies close in clusters. however, if it will prove that a brand new theory of gravity is required, what quite a theory would it not be? however, might it properly describe the motion of the bodies within the system, as Einstein’s theory is thought to try toto, and still provide the U.S.A. with the various prediction for the universe that we have a tendency to need? There area unit candidate theories, however none area uncompelling. that the mystery continues.

The issue that’s required to make your mind up between dark energy potentialities – a property of area, a brand new dynamic fluid, or a brand new theory of gravity – is additional knowledge, higher knowledge.

Dark energy or dark matter?

Dark energy makes up most of the universe, however, substance additionally covers a sizeable chunk. Comprising nearly twenty-seven p.c of the universe, and eighty p.c of the matter, substance additionally plays a dominant role.

Like dark energy, substance continues to confound scientists. whereas dark energy could be a force that accounts for the increasing universe, substance explains, however, teams of objects operate along.

In the Fifties, scientists learning different galaxies expected gravity to cause the centres to rotate quicker than the outer edges, supported the distribution of the objects within them. To their surprise, each region revolved at a similar rate, indicating that the spiral galaxies contained considerably a lot of mass than they perceived to. Studies of gas within elliptical galaxies and of clusters of galaxies disclosed that this hidden matter was unfolded throughout the universe.
Scientists have a variety of potential candidates for substance, move to unbelievably dim objects to strange particles. however, regardless of the supply of each substance and dark energy, it’s clear that the universe is stricken by things that scientists cannotconventionally observe.

The fate of the Universe

The evolution of the universe is ruled by the number of matter and dark energy it contains, however, the densities of matter and dark energy—their concentrations inside given volume of space—are affected terribly otherwise by cosmic growth. we have a decent plan of what quantity matter the universe holds, and though we do not understand exactly what it’s, we have a tendency to do comprehend it is plagued by gravity. The key, then, to understanding the ultimate fate of the Universe lies in understanding the opposite half this dark equation: dark energy.

Currently, cosmologists perceive nearly nothing regarding dark energy albeit it seems to comprise regarding seventy % of the mass-energy content of the universe. they’re urgently seeking to uncover its elementary properties: its strength, its permanency, and any variation with direction. they need to learn the properties of matter before they will verify its influence on the increasing Universe.

This evolution in cosmic scale is schematically shown within the higher than the figure for many cosmologies. during a universe with a high density of matter, the Edwin Bubble growth that began with the large Bang continues to decelerate thanks to the gravitation attraction of the matter filling the universe, ending during a massive crunch. during a universe with a lower vital density of matter, the growth coasts. during a universe with dark energy additionally as matter, the initial slowing is reversed at late times by the increasing dominance of dark energy.

If the hypothetic dark energy continues to dominate the universe’s energy balance, then the present growth of house can still accelerate, exponentially. Structures that don’t seem to be already gravitationally certain can ultimately fly apart. the planet and therefore the Milky Way Galaxy would stay undisturbed whereas the remainder of the universe seems to run far from the USA.
The nature of dark energy is presently a matter of speculation. Some believe that dark energy could be “vacuum energy,” diagrammatic by the “cosmological constant” (Λ, the Greek capital letter lambda) normally relativity theory, a relentless uniform density of dark energy throughout all of the house that’s freelance of your time or the universe’s growth. This notion was introduced by Einstein and is according to our restricted observations so far. instead, dark energy would possibly vary with time. solely new sorts of observations will settle the difficulty.

Final Words

We do understand this: Since the area is everyplace, this dark energy force is everyplace, and its effects increase as area expands. In distinction, gravity’s force is stronger once things area unit close and weaker after they area unit so much apart. as a result of gravity is weakening with the enlargement of area, dark energy currently makes up over 2/3 of all the energy within the universe.
It sounds rather strange that we’ve got no firm plan regarding what makes up seventy-four of the universe. It’s as if we have a tendency to had explored all the land on the world Earth associate degreed ne’er all told our travels encountered an ocean. however currently that we’ve caught sight of the waves, we wish to grasp what this immense, strange, powerful entity extremely is.

The strangeness of dark energy is thrilling.

It shows scientists that there’s a spot in our information that must be crammed, beckoning the manner toward associate degree undiscovered realm of physics. we’ve got before the United States the proof that the cosmos could also be organized immensely otherwise than we have a tendency to imagine. Dark energy each signals that we have a tendency to still have a good deal to find out, and shows the United States that we have a tendency to stand poised for an additional nice leap in our understanding of the universe.

End of the Universe

End of the Universe

How will the universe end, and could anything survive?

The universe serves up spectacle after spectacle with so much ease and effortlessness that you cannot help but wonder how it has so many complexities hidden within its ulterior cloak of beauty. On the surface, the universe is magnificent and splendid. The immortal souls that are credited for creating it are not yet finished with it. Perhaps, they get lost in its admiration and in its beauty and lose track of the job at hand. The fact that the universe can be so alluring despite its intricacies is in itself worth cherishing. But, like all good things, the universe will come to an end.

The end of the universe is not near, however, it is inevitable. There might not be any need to set alarm bells ringing anytime in the near future, but, the universe does have an expiration date.There have been several theories on how the universe could end. If the universe has been a cause for fascination and you want to learn more about how it could potentially all end, then, this article is just for you. Read on.

Let’s start from the beginning, the Origin of the Universe

To predict an ending, you would have to understand the beginning. Like all spectacular things, the universe too had a spectacular origin. This beginning was the Big Bang. The Big Bang theory explains the evolution that the universe had to undergo. This theory states that the universe was initially extremely hot and dense.As time passed, the universe began to cool and expand.


Image Source: Coldcreation

According to the Standard model, the four fundamental forces in the universe are gravity, strong and weak attractive forces and electromagnetic radiation. Of the four, gravity is considered to be the weakest. It is hypothesized that during the beginning of the universe that gravity was as strong as the other fundamental forces. All the matter in the universe was condensed into such small spaces that the gravity had to be extremely high. The universe did not stay in this condensed state for too long and began to expand. The expansion is considered to be perpetual and is taking place even while you are reading this.

What is really scary is the fact that the rate of this expansion keeps increasing every second. This expansion is credited to dark energy, but, nobody really knows for sure what it is. Here are the theories that try to explain how the universe could end.

The Big Rip

For as long as we have known, the universe has been expanding. During this process of expansion, lots and lots of space was created. Galaxies began to move apart since the space between them increased. Within the galaxy, the space also expanded. However, the gravity acted as the glue that kept it all together. The gravity provides the force that keeps the galaxies together. It is strong enough to negate the expansion. In the Big Rip scenario, the rate of expansion increases so drastically that it reaches a point where gravity cannot counter or negate the effect of the expansion of space. The acceleration of space expansion would be tremendously high.This causes the universe to, well, rip. This is what is referred to as the Big Rip.

This effect would start with the larger bodies and slowly propagate to the smaller bodies. It would first start with the galaxies. These galaxies would get ripped apart. Then, black holes, stars, and planets would die. Since the gravity is not strong enough, they would simply just dissolve into their constituents. Then these smaller components would disintegrate. Everything we know would get ripped apart.

Space would then start expanding so fast that it would be faster than even light! Atoms and subatomic particles would also tear apart. Since space is moving so fast, there would be no interaction between particles. So, even the small particles that remain after this massive expansion cannot interact with anything in the universe to form bigger particles. This universe would be so strange that when you compare it with today’s universe, it would seem ridiculous.The possibility is unfathomable, but, not impossible.

The Big Freeze

Simply put, the difference between the Big Freeze and the Big Rip is that in the Big Freeze scenario, matter does not disintegrate, it gets converted into radiation in a process that could take forever. To understand this, you will need to understand entropy. The second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of an isolated system can never decrease, therefore, every body moves to a state which increases its entropy. This means that every body cools down and it disintegrates until it reaches some form of equilibrium. This is true for the universe as well. The matter in the universe slowly disintegrates and spreads out. Every body, whether big or small, will have its matter disintegrating into radiation.

The gas clouds required to generate stars would disintegrate. The universe will become an extremely dark place as a result. The suns would also disintegrate. Black holes would be the only entities left in the universe. These black holes, however, will also lose energy in the form of Hawking radiation and also disintegrate. Slowly but almost surely, only a few light particles would remain. But, even these will eventually decay. The universe would be reduced to nothing. A place of nothingness. Entropy would have reached its maximum, and the highest form of equilibrium would have been reached. The universe would have finally ended.

However, all hope is not lost. The phenomenon of quantum tunneling could cause a change in the entropy leading to another Big Bang. In this case, the universe would just restart as if nothing really happened.

The Big Crunch and The Big Bounce

Gravity, which is the weakest of all fundamental forces could one day become the most powerful. This is possible if the amount of dark energy reduces substantially over time. This would mean that the universe would simply stop expanding. This would mean that the rate of expansion would slow down at some point and keep slowing down until the process of expansion ceases. Then, it slows down even more and reverses. The universe, instead of growing, would begin to contract and become smaller and smaller. Galaxies will merge, and the universe will get significantly hotter. The temperatures would reach such high levels that bodies that cannot bear such temperatures would disintegrate. Everything will get denser.

Big Crunch by Wikipedia

Big Crunch Illustration. Image Source : Wikipedia

Black holes that consume everything close to them, would begin consuming bodies. As things get closer and closer, more objects would get closer to black holes. These black holes would consume everything including other black holes. The amount of gravity will be immense. All black holes will eventually form a single supermassive blackhole at the center of the universe. At the last moment of the Big Crunch, the entire universe would be consumed by the gigantic black hole and finally, it would consume itself. The Big Bounce theory states that this entire process has been taking place for a long while. According to the Big Crunch, the universe is stuck in a loop of expansion and contraction leading to many deaths and rebirths of the universe.

The timeline for the end of the universe

Our planet will cease to exist in about 1 billion years from now. The Sun would burn 10% brighter and the heat from the sun would dry up all the water on earth. All life will be extinguished. In about 5 to 8 billion years, the sun would undergo expansion to reach a size that is so big that it would devour most planets. In about 1 trillion years from now, all galaxies would merge into one. In 100 trillion years, we would enter the degenerate era. This era is marked by the death of all stars in the galaxies, which, results in black holes. In 10 to 100 quintillion years, everything would be consumed by black holes. In a decillion years time, we might have the black hole era, where the universe is dominated by black holes. Eventually, these black holes will lose energy in the form of Hawking radiation and die too. In about a googol year, the universe would cease to exist.

Erich Fromm, a renowned psychologist, and sociologist once said, “The quest for certainty blocks the search for meaning. Uncertainty is the very condition to impel man to unfold his powers”. There is so much uncertainty around. Everything in the universe is uncertain, so much so that even the universe itself is uncertain! The universe always has a clever way to teach important lessons. Uncertainty should compel humanity to make the most of the time we have.

The universe can die but it can start all over again. The reality that we observe today may not be considered reality at all in the distant future. Whether the universe ends or not, one thing is certain, the universe should be cherished and celebrated while we can all still bask in its splendor.

What Is a Black Hole

Black Holes Explained

Black Holes: Discovery, Facts and Theories

A Black hole has always been a thing of immense wonder. Even the most fervent scientists have been unable to fully understand a black hole. A part of its magnificence probably lies in the fact that it still has certain mysteries associated with it. The more you find out about black holes, the more mesmerized you become. So, if you are looking to learn about black holes and possess a desire to try and understand them better, then, stick around, this article is just for you.


  1. What are black holes?
  2. Creation of black holes
  3. The death of black holes
  4. What’s inside a black hole?
  5. Types of black holes
  6. Black holes fun facts
  7. Black Hole Infographic

What are black holes?

Black holes are where God divided by zero.--Albert Einstein Click To Tweet

According to Wikipedia “A black hole is a region of spacetime exhibiting gravitational acceleration so strong that nothing—no particles or even electromagnetic radiation such as light—can escape from it“. Most black holes are created when stars implode. The gravity at the centre of the star reaches such high values that the star can no longer sustain the reactions that take place at its core. This implosion gives rise to a body of immensely high gravitational pull, called the black hole. These black holes are said to have an extremely high gravitational pull, which, led to the notion that black holes suck in everything around them. Albert Einstein has been credited for predicting the existence of black holes through his general theory of relativity. However, the term ‘black hole’ was coined by John Wheeler.

Creation of black holes

Cygnus X-1 black hole illustration

Cygnus X-1 (the image is an artist’s impression). Image Source: Sun.org

So, how are black holes formed? So, we all know that there are trillions of stars out there in the universe and all these stars continuously undergo fission reaction to keep shining. But, there comes a point when the star has very little fuel to burn out or the star gets receives extra matter in a way that does not raise its core temperature, in both these cases the star collapses. If the mass of the collapsing star is greater than a threshold then it will form a black hole. These black holes are called stellar black holes. The said threshold is called the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff limit which is 3-4 solar masses(M)

           M = (1.98847±0.00007)×1030 kg

This is not the only way by which black holes can form. Black holes can also form by high energy collisions which can achieve sufficient density. However, till now we didn’t detect any such events directly or indirectly probably because of mass-imbalance in particle accelerators. Thus, scientists came to the conclusion that there might be some lower boundary of mass for black holes to form and that would lie around Planck mass.

          Planck mass = mP=ħ c/G ≈ 1.2×1019 GeV/c2 ≈ 2.2×10−8 kg


  • ħ is the Planck’s constant
  • c is the speed of light
  • G is the universal gravitation constant
  • e is the charge of an electron
  • V is 1 volt
  • eV/c2 is commonly used to express mass in particle physics

The outer visible part of the black hole is referred to as the event horizon. In other words, the event horizon is the boundary of the black hole. The innermost part of the black hole is, what scientists call, the singularity. The constituents of a black hole are not quite known to even the most ardent scientists who study black holes.

The death of black holes

Black holes do not last forever either. In an excruciatingly slow process, black holes emanate energy and become hotter and hotter. Black holes, in this process, begin to grow smaller and smaller. They eventually disintegrate in a massive and spectacular manner, with an explosion. This entire process is attributed to the empty space around the black hole. This disintegration is often referred to as black hole evaporation.

You might have heard that the empty space is not actually empty. This is true, empty space consists of virtual particles that randomly come into existence and cancel each other out every now and then. The pair of particles that cancel each other out, is generally referred to as, the particle-antiparticle pair. When this process takes place at the event horizon of the black hole, some particles enter the black hole, while others escape outwards into space.

This results in the loss of energy of the black hole. This loss causes the black hole to become smaller. Initially, this process is slow, but, it soon picks up the pace and becomes faster. This radiation of energy by the black hole is called the Hawking radiation, named after probably one of the most renowned physicists of the recent past, Dr Stephen Hawking.


This flow chart shows the life cycle of stars from birth to remnant stages. Image Source: Wikipedia

What’s inside a black hole?

To be honest, nobody really knows for sure. It is highly unlikely that you would find someone on the face of the earth who could tell you with a great deal of certainty, what exists inside a black hole. The black hole, due to its immense gravitational pull, does tend to pull most entities that are present in its proximity. However, the belief that it attracts particles and bodies towards it, is a misconception. A black hole does not attract entities towards itself, it merely consumes the bodies that are already close to it. That is, if an entity is far away from the black hole, the black hole would not cause the entity to move closer towards the black hole, however, if the entity were in the devouring range of the black hole, it would inadvertently get sucked in.

Nothing is said to escape from the black hole. Even light can’t escape its clutches. To escape from the inside of a black hole, it is said that you would have to be travelling at speeds greater than the speed of light which is not possible according to Einstein’s theories. It is believed that most of the mass of the black hole is concentrated at its centre. This part of the black hole where the mass is said to accumulate is called the singularity.

To figure out what actually is inside a black hole, we would have to send something into it. The problem with this is that anything that enters the black hole cannot return from it. It is highly likely that we will never find out what actually is inside of a black hole.

If you have ever thought to yourself that it would be fascinating to enter a black hole and have ever considered going into one, you should probably reconsider. The larger the black hole, the more intact you are likely to be when you enter, but, there does not exist a black hole that would not kill you as soon as you reach the event horizon. You would get spread, elongated and ripped apart in what is known as spaghettification. Spaghettification is the process in which objects are ripped apart due to the strong gravitational pull of the black hole.

Types of black holes

Blackholes are considered to be of three main types, based on their mass. They are

  1. Stellar black holes
  2. Supermassive black holes
  3. Miniature black holes.

Stellar black holes are those that are formed by the collapsing of the stars. The exact process of formation of stellar black holes is mentioned above The masses of these black holes generally range from 5 to several times the mass of the sun.

Supermassive black holes, on the other hand, have masses that are several hundred or thousands of times the mass of the sun. It is hypothesized that every galaxy in the universe has a supermassive black hole at its centre. Sagittarius A is the black hole considered to be at the centre of the Milky Way. Some scientists also believe that these supermassive black holes have existed since the creation of the universe, or at least, since the creation of each galaxy.

Miniature black holes, as the name suggests, possess the smallest mass of all black holes. There was a time when physicists and astronomers believed that the stellar black hole was the smallest form of black holes. Stephen Hawking introduced the concept that there might exist black holes smaller than the mass of the stellar black hole. These are said to be primordial black holes. Primordial black holes are those that have existed since the Big Bang. These are speculated to have been formed due to the fluctuations in the density of the universe. Theoretically, anything that can have its mass densely condensed and possess an escape velocity greater than the speed of light can become a black hole but experimentally a black hole can possess any mass equal to or greater than the Planck mass.

Planck mass= 2.2×10−8 kg or 22 micrograms

Speaking about its radius, since the escape velocity must be greater than the speed of light, the Schwarzschild radius comes into the picture and it is,

R= 2GM/c^2


G is the gravitational constantc is the speed of light, and M the mass of the black hole.

Schwarzschild radius is the parameter that corresponds to the radius of the event horizon of the black hole. Every quantity of mass possesses this parameter.

Black holes facts

  • Black holes are said to grow when they consume objects and bodies in space.
  • Black holes have such powerful gravitational pull that not even light can escape it.
  • Black holes are gigantic and are often several times the size of the sun.
  • Black holes are often considered to be perfect black bodies since they do not reflect light.
  • The process of death of black holes is unimaginably slow. It takes a whopping 10^67 to 10^100 years for a black hole to eventually die.
  • There exists a black hole at the centre of the Milky Way. It is called Sagittarius A and is situated at a distance of 26,000 light years from the Solar system.

Even today, there is rigorous research going on to completely understand black holes. Recently there was a major achievement in this research and that was getting the first-ever image of a black hole.

Scientists are now planning to get improved pictures of black holes. Let us hope that uncover the secrets of cosmos and answer some questions which have been daunting scientists from centuries

Neil Armstrong, widely renowned for being the first man to step on the moon, once said, “Mystery creates wonder and wonder is the basis of man’s desire to understand”. Perhaps, there exists no phenomenon in the world that epitomizes the saying more than a black hole does. Black holes are incredibly fascinating and are surrounded with so much mystery that one cannot help but be enamoured by it. However, black holes are quite dangerous, nonetheless. If one were to travel anywhere close to one, they would be sucked into it with no point of return. In all honesty, it would be truly amazing to venture into a black hole to find out what it consists of, but, it most certainly is not worth the risk. A simile that best sums up the situation goes something like

Black holes are like clickbait, you want to go in, but once you do, you regret it Click To Tweet

What do you think about a black hole? Would you like to travel across a black hole and come back if some phenomena allowed it? Tell us with a short and quick comment.

Black Hole Infographic

Embed Image

Black Hole Infographic

Big Bang and the Age of the Universe

Big Bang and the Age of the Universe

Astronomers calculated that the Big Bang occurred between twelve and fourteen billion years ago. To place this in perspective, the solar system is assumed to be 4.5 billion years old and humans have existed for a few million years.

Astronomers estimate the age of the universe in 2 ways:

  1. By trying to find the oldest stars
  2. By finding out the speed of expansion of the universe and extrapolating back to the Big Bang

Is it older than the stars?

Astronomers could place a lower limit to the age of the universe by studying about Globular clusters. These circular clusters are a dense assortment of roughly 1,000,000 stars. Stellar densities close to the middle of these clusters are huge. If we lived close to the middle of one, there would be several hundred thousand stars closer to us than the Proxima Centauri, the nearest star after the Sun.

The life cycle of a star is solely depended upon its mass. High Mass stars are a lot brighter than Low Mass stars; therefore they quickly burn through their supply of hydrogen fuel. A star just like the Sun has enough fuel in its core to burn at its current brightness for roughly nine billion years. A star that is twice as massive as the Sun will burn through its fuel supply in only 800 million years. A 10 solar mass star, a star that is 10 times more massive than the Sun, burns nearly a thousand times brighter and has only a 20 million year fuel supply. Conversely, a star that is half as massive as the Sun burns slowly enough for its fuel to last more than 20 billion years.

All the stars in a globular cluster are formed roughly at the same time; therefore they function like cosmic clocks. If a cluster is over twenty million years old, then all of its hydrogen-burning stars will be less massive than 10 solar masses. This suggests that no hydrogen-burning star is going to be over a thousand times brighter than the Sun. If a cluster is over two billion years old, then there’ll be no hydrogen-burning star more massive than 2 solar masses.

The oldest cluster contains only those stars which are less massive than 0.7 solar masses. Low Mass stars are a lot less dim than the Sun. This observation suggests that the oldest clusters are between 11 and 14 billion years old. The uncertainty in this estimate is because of the problem in finding the precise distance to cluster (hence, uncertainty within the brightness (and mass) of the stars in the cluster). Another source of uncertainty during this estimate lies in our ignorance of finer details of stellar evolution.

Astronomers also study some old stars and try to detect remaining dust from ancient supernova to have some more limits to the age of the universe.

However, there are some stars found which contradicts the currently believed age of 13.8 billion years. Read about one such star called HD 140283 here

Hubble constant

An alternative approach to estimate the age of the universe is to calculate the “Hubble constant”. The Hubble constant is a measure of the expansion rate of the universe. Cosmologists use this activity to extrapolate back to the Big Bang. This extrapolation depends on the history of the expansion rate that depends on the present density of the universe and on the composition of the universe.

If the universe is flat and composed largely of matter, then the age of the universe is

2/(3 Ho)

where Ho denotes the Hubble’s constant.

If the universe has a very low density of matter, then its extrapolated age is larger:


If the universe contains a form of matter similar to the cosmological constant, then the inferred age can be even larger.

Cosmic distance ladder

Many astronomers are operating exhaustingly to calculate the Hubble’s constant employing a type of completely different techniques. Till recently, the simplest estimates ranged from 65 km/sec/Megaparsec to 80 km/sec/Megaparsec. In additional acquainted units, astronomers believe that 1/Ho is between 12 and 14 billion years.

The latest news on Hubble constant:

Researchers detect abnormal rates in the expansion of universe

In the latest researches, the results have been shown that the universe is enlarging much quicker than it should be based on the conditions after Big Bang. The constantly increasing rate of the universe is known as Hubble Constant and it has been very hard to pin down the rate.


On comparing the two age determinations, there is a potential crisis. If the universe is flat and dominated by ordinary or dark matter, the age of the universe as estimated from the Hubble constant would be around 9 billion years. This would lead to a contradiction as the age of the universe would be shorter than the age of oldest stars. This contradiction implies that either

  1. Our measurement of the Hubble constant itself is incorrect
  2. The Big Bang theory has to be replaced
  3. That we need a form of matter like a cosmological constant that implies an older age for a given observed expansion rate.

Some astronomers believe that this crisis will pass as soon as measurements improve. If the astronomers who have measured the smaller values of the Hubble constant are correct, and if the smaller estimates of globular cluster ages are also correct, then all is well for the Big Bang theory, even without a cosmological constant.

WMAP satellite

Measurements by the WMAP (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe) satellite facilitated and confirmed the age of the universe. By measuring the thermal radiation left over from the Big Bang(known as Cosmic Microwave Background), missions such as WMAP are able to determine the density, composition and expansion rate of the universe. As of 2013, WMAP determined these parameters with an accuracy of higher than 1.5%. In turn, knowing the composition with this precision, we could estimate the age of the universe to about 0.4%: 13.77 ± 0.059 billion years!

WMAP satellite artist depiction from NASA

WMAP satellite artist depiction. Image Source: NASA

How does WMAP data enable us to determine the age of the universe is 13.77 billion years, with an uncertainty of only 0.4%? The key to this is that by knowing the composition of matter and energy density in the universe, we will use Einstein’s theory of relativity to calculate how fast the universe has been expanding in the past. With this information, we will flip the clock back and estimate when the universe had “zero” size, in line with Einstein.

The time between then and now could be the age of the universe. There’s one caveat to keep in mind that affects the understanding of the age determination: we have a tendency to assume that the universe is flat, that is well supported by WMAP and alternative knowledge. If we relax this assumption, the uncertainty will increase. Inflation naturally predicts a really nearly flat universe.

The expansion age measured by WMAP is larger than the oldest globular clusters, so, Big Bang theory has passed a crucial test using data independent of the type collected by WMAP. If the expansion age measured by WMAP had been smaller than the oldest globular clusters, then there would be something wrong in either the Big Bang theory or the theory of stellar evolution. Either way, astronomers would have required rethinking several of their cherished concepts. However, our current estimate of age fits well with what we all know from other forms of measurements.

Final Words

So, in conclusion, we’ve 2 methods — one from our cosmic history and one by measuring native stars — that show us our Universe’s age is between thirteen and fourteen billion years. Today it is widely accepted that our universe in 13.772 billion years old with a possible error of 59 million years. However, there are a lot of observations and experiments going on to get more precise age of our universe


Should We Call the Cosmos Seeking ET? Or Is That Risky?

Astronomers have their own version of the single person’s dilemma: Do you wait by the phone for a call from that certain someone? Or do you make the call yourself and risk getting shot down?

Instead of love, of course, astronomers are looking for alien life, and for decades, they have sat by their telescopes, waiting to hear from E.T. It didn’t happen, and so now some of them want to beam messages out into the void and invite the closest few thousand worlds to chat or even visit.

Others scientists, including Stephen Hawking, think that’s crazy, warning that instead of sweet and gentle E.T., we may get something like the planet-conquering aliens from “Independence Day.” The consequences, they say, could be catastrophic.

But calling out there ourselves may be the only way to find out if we are not alone, and humanity may benefit from alien intelligence, said Douglas A. Vakoch, whose title — for real — is director of interstellar message composition at the SETI Institute in Mountain View, California. SETI stands for Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, and until now it’s been mostly a listening-type thing.

This dispute — which mixes astronomy, science fiction, philosophy, the law, mathematics and a touch of silliness — broke out Thursday and Friday at a convention in San Jose of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

And this week several prominent space experts, including Space X founder Elon Musk and planet hunter Geoff Marcy, started a petition cautioning against sending out such messages, saying it is impossible to predict whether extraterrestrial life will be benign or hostile.

Vakoch is hosting a separate conference Saturday at the SETI Institute on the calling-all-aliens proposal and what the messages should say.

The idea is called active SETI, and according to Vakoch would involve the beaming of messages via radar and perhaps eventually lasers.

We’ve been inadvertently sending radio and TV signals out to the cosmos for some 70 years — though less now, with cable and satellite sending shows directly down to Earth. In fact, each day a new far-off planet may be just now catching the latest episode of the 1950s sitcom “I Love Lucy,” said astronomer Seth Shostak, a senior astronomer at the SETI Institute.

There have been a few small and unlikely-to-work efforts to beam messages out there in the past, including NASA sending the Beatles song “Across the Universe” into the cosmos in 2008. NASA’s Voyager probe recently left the solar system with a “golden record” created by Carl Sagan with a message, and the space agency’s New Horizon probe will also have greetings on it by the time it exits the solar system.

But what scientists are now talking about is a coordinated and sustained million-dollar-a-year effort with approval from some kind of science or international body and a message that people agree on.

It’s an “attempt to join the galactic club,” Vakoch said. He assured a crowd of reporters: “There’s no danger of alien invasion from active SETI.”

Continue reading the main storyContinue reading the main story
But as a science fiction author, as well as an astrophysicist, David Brin thinks inviting aliens here is a bad idea. Even if there is a low risk of a nasty creature coming, the consequences could be extreme.

“I can’t bring myself to wager my grandchildren’s destiny on unreliable assumptions” about benevolent aliens, Brin said.

Brin noted that European explorers brought slaughter and disease to less technologically advanced people in the Americas more than 500 years ago. He called for the science community to put efforts on hold for an ethical and scientific discussion on “why it won’t go the same way as between Cortez and the Aztecs.”

As Brin, Shostak, Vakoch and others sparred at a news conference, 84-year-old Frank Drake sat in the back quietly. Drake, a pioneer in the search for extraterrestrial life, created the formula called Drake’s Equation that scientists use to estimate the chances that other life is out there. More than 40 years ago, Drake and Sagan beamed a message into space to look for aliens, a first for Earth.

It was a short message from the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico, and it was aimed at a star cluster called Messier 13. It will take 25,000 years to get there, Drake said.

“The probability of succeeding is infinitesimally small,” Drake said, rolling out calculations about the incredible amount of time it takes messages to go back and forth and his estimate that the average civilization will last only 10,000 years.

So why’d he do it? Curiosity, Drake said. And it doesn’t matter if our civilization is gone by the time E.T. answers, if he does.

“We get messages from the ancient Greeks and Romans and Socrates all the time, long since gone. Still valuable,” Drake said. “We’re going to do the archaeology of the future.”



SETI Institute: http://www.seti.org


Berkeley statement cautioning against active SETI: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/meti_statement_0.html


New Horizons messaging initiative: http://www.oneearthmessage.org


Depiction of black hole in space by artist

Evaporating black holes? Explained

Can the concepts of relativistic quantum field theory be carried over to curved space-times, which include gravitational sources and are described by Einstein’s theory of general relativity? The answer is a “Yes”. Stephen Hawking, the most famous physicist of recent time, took the most notable step in this direction in the 1970s.

Hawking examined a model of quantum particles not in the gravity-free environment of special relativity, but in a space-time containing a black hole. The result was surprising: The mere presence of the black hole means that, even if at early times not a single particle was present, at late times, there is a steady stream of them escaping to infinity. In other words: a black hole emits quantum particles! This conjectured radiation is known as “Hawking radiation“. While it has not yet been observed, convincing reasons for its existence appear to be built right into the foundations of quantum theory.

Higher the mass of the black hole, lower will be the temperature and intensity of Hawking radiation. The following table shows a few black hole masses, corresponding Schwarzschild radii (which measure the size of a spherical black hole) and the temperature (measured in Kelvin) of the radiation it emits. Each entry has as a background the characteristic colour of thermal radiation with the given temperature:

MassSchwarzschild radiusTemperature
Solar mass3 kilometres (1.9 miles)1 tenth of a millionth Kelvin
Mass of the earth9 millimetres0.02 Kelvin
Mass of the moon1/10 millimetres1.7 Kelvin
1/10 mass of the moon1/100 millimetre17 Kelvin
1/100 mass of the moon1 millionth of a metre170 Kelvin
1/1000 mass of the moon1/10 millionth of a metre1700 Kelvin
1/2000 mass of the moon1/20 millionth of a metre3300 Kelvin
1/5000 mass of the moon1/50 millionth of a metre8400 Kelvin


As the colours show, astrophysical black holes – such as stellar and supermassive black holes – are indeed black. Black holes lighter than about a hundredth of the mass of the earth’s moon, however, glow in the dark. Even lighter ones – a five-thousandth the mass of the moon – are white-hot objects, and look the part. For holes that are lighter still, most radiation is emitted as UV radiation, X-rays or even highly energetic gamma radiation.

The table doesn’t indicate intensities. In fact, the black holes shown are dark. For black holes with lesser masses, however, significant fractions of mass and energy are radiated away – the smaller the mass, the greater the power. This leads to a runaway process in which the black hole evaporates with a final, gigantic flash of energy

If at all “mini black holes” with very little mass have formed in our universe, some might now have reached the stage where such violent evaporation occurs. But till now we haven’t found any astronomical evidence for highly energetic evaporation processes, and Hawking radiation remains purely theoretical.

In calculations like Hawking’s initial derivation of radiating black holes, the matter is described in quantum terms, but the concepts of classical general relativity are used to describe the space-time environment. However, there are situations when this semi-classical treatment is insufficient. To fully understand our universe, these situations indicate that it is necessary to formulate a quantum theory of gravity, in which space and time are subject to the laws of the quantum world as well.